BRANFORD DENIED ITS DAY IN COURT
A New Haven Register Editorial, 09/18/2007
The law and common sense have diverged in the $12.8 million verdict for a developer against Branford for the wrongful taking by eminent domain of 77 acres next to a dump. The developer, New England Estates, doesn't own the land. It holds an option to buy it to build housing.
The verdict should be appealed by the town. An appeal is also likely for the value Superior Court Judge William T. Cremins placed on the property, $4.6 million, far more than the $1,167,800 fixed by the town.
The wrongful taking verdict is particularly irksome, not only because of its size, but because the town's shuffling of lawyers resulted in a failure to meet a critical court deadline. Consequently, its expert witnesses were blocked from testifying.
The town had decided to take the land in 2003. The town's landfill engineers were concerned about contaminated groundwater underneath the site, methane migration along the border between the dump and the property and untested dumping on the site. The developers sued to stop the town's taking of the land. After a hearing, a Superior Court trial referee rejected the developers' claim town officials were in fact colluding to block affordable housing. Anthony DeMayo held that the "potential for serious contamination involves the health of residents in the area" and that "there is the potential for litigation" from home buyers.
Following DeMayo's ruling, the town took the land by eminent domain in January 2004.
Cremins did not allow the jury in the wrongful taking lawsuit to hear DeMayo's ruling. Cremins refused to allow as evidence an environmental engineer's letter on contamination at the parcel or allow expert testimony in the town's defense.
The town's new trial attorney said he had never been told of a May 30 deadline set in February for filing lists of expert witnesses with the court and opposing attorneys. In February, the town was represented by The Marcus Law Firm. Cremins refused to extend the deadline.
Barred from presenting a full defense, the town lost. It should do better on appeal. |